The rapid urbanization and industrialization of regions has greatly
contributed to the world’s economy in the past few decades. But the
indicated “growth model” or rather phenomenon of these processes
deeply correlates with high energy consumption and electricity
usage, which in turn leads to an economic model problem of
integrating high CO₂ emissions and increasing the greenhouse effect.
All of these factors now are the cornerstone problems to sustainable
development for countries around the world (Dong et al., 2021).
Primary a global measurement of energy consumption was 10,031.6 Mtoe
in 2003 and should have been at 13,864.9 Mtoe in 2018 with 38.21%
increase (BP, 2019).
Simultaneously, global emission of CO₂ has also increased from
25,715.7 million tonnes to 33,890.8 million tonnes which is by
31.79%.
This massive increase on those fossil fuel like coal and oil had
result in dangerous technological advancement (Dong et al., 2021).
These rapid changes in the emission pace leads to even higher global
warming claiming even stronger threat to the natural balance
systems.
We have established that having defined the economy also defines the
efficiency of influence on the environment. But in addition to these
factors, the lack of political stability also impacts the
environmental consequences. Political conflicts like the Middle East
or North Africa are highly damaging to a regions economic
development or citizen social order in a C02 emitting level. These
risks must be explored as one to calculate and control the climate
crisis on a global level.
The analysis for this study has been framed around three pivotal
elements: the scale effect, the technique effect, and the structure
effect, with special focus on how political risks affect CO₂
emissions on an international scale. In addition, it analyzes
whether the consequences are homogeneous across countries and
regions, offering an understanding of the asymmetric and
heterogeneous impacts of political instability and environmental
harm.