Conclusion

Nuclear power remains a crucial and contentious factor in the worldwide energy scene. Originally seen as a hopeful answer to increasing energy needs, its advancement faced major delays after devastating incidents such as Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011, which heightened public fears regarding the safety of nuclear facilities and the enduring dangers of radioactive waste (Ferguson, 2011; Beckrich, 2013). Regardless of these worries, nuclear power continues to be one of the most effective and eco-friendly sources of extensive electricity generation. It produces low greenhouse gas emissions while operating and boasts a high efficiency level compared to fossil fuels. In advanced countries like France—where close to 70% of electrical power comes from nuclear energy—nuclear power is crucial for maintaining energy security and economic stability (Akyüz, 2023).
 
Additionally, nuclear power aids in job development and needs comparatively less land than other energy production methods, which makes it appealing for densely populated or land-limited areas. Nonetheless, issues like radioactive waste management, the expensive construction
 
of new reactors, and reliance on limited uranium supplies persist in fueling controversy (Botkin & Keller, 2011;(“Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy,” 2023).
 
The prospects of nuclear energy depend on global collaboration, political guidance, and technological advancements. While the world confronts climate change impacts and looks for low-carbon options, nuclear power might be crucial—provided safety protocols are enhanced and public confidence is restored (Sheth, 2013). Fusion energy, while still under development, offers potential as a cleaner and safer substitute for conventional fission, potentially revolutionizing the global energy market if effectively utilized (Technology Glossary, 2024).

 

References
 

Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy. (2023, Apr 17). CE Noticias Financieras Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/wire-feeds/advantages-disadvantages-nuclear-energy/docview/2802830401/se-2
Akyüz, E. (2023). Nuclear energy: Perception or reality? Academica Press. https://login.library.sheridanc.on.ca/login?url=https://search-ebscohost-com.library.sheridanc.on.ca/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xna&AN=3302407&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-71
Ferguson, C. D. (2011). Nuclear energy. Oxford University Press. https://searchlibrary.sheridancollege.ca/permalink/01OCLS_SHER/hhg492/alma991002040809707321
Leadership and the future of nuclear energy. (2011). Washington: Federal Information & News Dispatch, LLC. Retrieved from eLibrary; ProQuest Central Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/reports/leadership-future-nuclear-energy/docview/871275593/se-2
Lifsher, M. (2013, Jun 08). Southland can expect tight electricity supplies; the san onofre nuclear plant had produced about 9% of the state's power. Los Angeles Times Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/southland-can-expect-tight-electricity-supplies/docview/1365738569/se-2
 
Sheth, P. R. (2013). Future of nuclear energy. Current Science (Bangalore), 104(9), 1137–1137.   https://searchlibrary.sheridancollege.ca/permalink/01OCLS_SHER/1nqpso9/cdi_jstor_primary_24092388
Technology glossary: How nuclear energy is produced. (2024, Oct 16). CE Noticias Financieras Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/wire-feeds/technology-glossary-how-nuclear-energy-is/docview/3117820201/se-2